Editorial Policy

usmedicalgroup.org/

Editorial Policy

Our editorial policy explains how health-related information is written, checked, updated and kept separate from medical advice.

Human-reviewed content Official-source priority Not medical advice Emergency-safe guidance

Editorial mission

Our mission is to publish clear, cautious and helpful health-related information that helps users navigate official sources and ask better questions. Because health topics affect real decisions, we use stronger safety standards than ordinary informational websites.

Human-reviewed

Pages are written and checked by an editorial process before publication or major refresh.

Official-source first

We prioritise official provider websites, public-health agencies, government resources, insurer/provider directories and recognised medical references.

Information only

We explain and organise information. We do not diagnose, treat, prescribe, schedule care or replace a licensed medical professional.

Editorial standards

  1. Do no harm. We do not publish wording that encourages users to delay emergency care, stop medication, ignore symptoms or replace clinician advice.
  2. Use official and recognised sources. We prioritise CDC, NIH, MedlinePlus, FDA, HHS, state health departments, official provider websites and peer-reviewed or recognised clinical resources where appropriate.
  3. Separate education from advice. We provide general information only and avoid personalised diagnosis or treatment guidance.
  4. Make limitations visible. We add disclaimers near sensitive topics such as symptoms, medications, procedures, insurance, billing, mental health and emergencies.
  5. Review contact details manually. Public links, phone numbers, addresses and maps are checked where available before inclusion.

What we avoid

No diagnosis or treatment claims.

We do not tell a user what condition they have, what medication to take, what treatment to choose or whether a procedure is appropriate for them.

We also avoid dramatic cure claims, unsupported health-product claims, hidden advertising, copied medical pages, fear-based writing and claims that sound too good to be true.

When content needs clinical review

Pages that discuss symptoms, treatments, medications, procedures, screenings, warning signs, emergencies or patient-safety issues require stricter review. If content cannot be supported by official or recognised sources, we either revise it, add a stronger disclaimer, or avoid publishing the claim.

Leave a Comment